Weapons of Mass Destruction Supplied by EU and US

EU and America are supplying arms in Middle East to escalate the crisis.
Arms shipped to FSA, ISIL the Syrian rebels to fight president Assad
Arms to Libyan Rebels
Arms to Sudan Rebels
Arms to Somalia
Arms to Israel to kill Palestinian children
Arms to Iraqi Kurds
These arms are supplied to kill people by the Nobel Laureate for establishment of Peace, his excellency "Barack Obama" the president of the United States.

America's "New World disOrder"

Every single day in the Middle East is a bad day for America and its allies.
George W Bush, the stupidest president in the democratic world history had coined the phrase "New World Order"  which has now become a joke.
Nothing is going in their favour, on the International arena and as well as in the domestic setup.
Wikileaks was a huge blow on the hypocritic face of United State's foreign policy followed by uprising in the Arab countries. The Arabs have called Enough is Enough and have ejected the stooges of America one by one, and, the process is on.
The once supposed to be powerful Israel is in panic. The countdown for the puppet regimes supported by US has begun.
Japan, one of the staunchest ally of US has suffered by the hands of the mother nature.
Now the time has come for strategic partners of this so-called world power to rethink on their foreign policies and be independent in their thoughts and dealings with the Middle Eastern countries.
The time as changed. There is no more the 'New World Order' for America.
It is now a complete disORDER for its planning and policies. Bullying to the developing and weak nations is coming to an end.

The Jittery US

The year 2011 is not a good beginning for the US and the Europe alike. The uprising in the Arab countries has left them jittery:
They fear the impact on oil field in Libya.
They fear the impact on peace treaty of Egypt and Israel.
They fear the impact on their military presence in Bahrain.
They fear the impact of losing loyal allies like Yemen, Tunisia, Saudia, Jordan and many countries run by the dictators and puppets.
The so-called champions of democracy are losing their ground and trying to consolidate their influence in many countries.
When the revolution begins, they support the tyrant rulers. Later, when they find the people are on the verge of victory, they verbally support the people.
They consider the masses as fools.
Soon they will know their true position after the democratic setup in these countries (if they are allowed to do so).

House of Saud: Servant of Israel and America

In the 333 days of war between Israel and Lebanon, Hezbollah had defended their soil and forced the Zionist army to retreat shamefully. In this war the Muslim Ummah openely supported Hezbollah all over the world. But, Unfortunately the Saudi and Wahhabi regime worked hard against Hezbollah and tried its best that it could be defeated.
During the people's revolution in Egypt, this Najdi regime tried its best that Husni Mubarak remains in power.
Saudi gave full moral and military support to the Yemeni government to crush the uprising of the oppressed Yemenis.
This Wahhabi regime also financed the sectarian elements like al Qaida to create rift among Muslims in Iraq.
In the Bahrain uprising Saudi is playing a dirty role in helping to crush the people's protest.
Saudi Arabia was against the Palestinians and never uttered a word against the siege of Gaza by Israel.
Funded the extremists and fanatics of Pakistan to create sectarian chaos and disrespect the beliefs of other sects of Islam.
Bin Laden is the product of this same Wahhabi thoughts who do not believe in mercy, but, project an image of brutal Islam to the world.
The Talibans are the illegitimate offspring of these tyrant royal family active in Afghanistan and Pakistan, massacring innocent women and children in market place through suicide bombings.
The ruler of Saudia calls himself to be the "Khaadimul Haramayn Shareefayn" (servant of the twin Holy Shrines-Makkah and Madinah), while infact he is "Khadimul Yahood wan Nasaara" (servant of Israel and America).

Unrest in US

Tens of thousands of public workers have gathered outside the statehouse in Wisconsin in an attempt to protest budget cuts they fear would curb their union rights.

State workers staged mass protests on Thursday to oppose the plan which curtails union rights sharply for public employees. Some families even camped out overnight in a last-ditch effort to block passage of the bill, ABC news reported on Friday.

Freedom of Speech, But, not against US

An activist protesting a speech given by Hillary Clinton on internet freedom is thrown out and arrested at George Washington University in Washington DC.

The activist, 71-year-old Ray McGovern, who is a US Army veteran and former CIA analyst, was manhandled and removed by security officers after trying to draw attention with a poster.

Democracy in the Arab World

When Zionists in the US and Israel mention "democracy in the Arab world," they really mean "peace with Israel."  A country is then democratic to the extent to which it has peace with Israel, and anti-democratic if it opposes peace with Israel.  That is their (il)logic.  Thus, Anwar Sadat was a democrat at the height of his dictatorial rule. 

Opinion of the Israeli Intellectual Media

Although many Israeli commentators are rehearsing these fears about Islamist politics, some have questioned these reactions. "There are no religious slogans in Tahrir square, but still we look upon the Muslim Brotherhood as though it is the greatest threat," says Zvi Bar'el, veteran middle eastern affairs analyst for Haaretz newspaper. "This is how we are educated by the government and media, to see Islam as a symbol of evil."
Bar'el adds that Israelis do not register the contradiction of claiming to support democracy, but only on condition that Islamic parties such as the Palestinian Hamas or Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood are not elected. "It has no meaning if you attach these terms," he says, adding that Israel's position is: "We support democracy, as long as you keep the dictatorial regimes in place."
Dr Bachar at the IPS says that Israeli policy is based on the assumption that there are only two alternatives in the Middle East: "a dictator that can be worked with – or chaos." He cautions that Israel "needs to change the record, insert a new disc".

Obama to Mubarak: License to Murder the Egyptian people

As soon as I saw the defiant tone and substance of Mubarak's speech, I realized that he is not speaking for himself but for the US/Israeli sponsors.  Israel erred before the Arab people by exposing her intense panic and fear from the prospect of an Arab democracy next door.  Of course, Obama would take note and he consulted with his key adviser on the Middle East, Netanyahu.  I just read the speech by Obama: it confirmed my suspicion, that basically Mubarak was permitted by the US to do with the Egyptian people as he would like.  Every drop of blood that is spilled in Egypt from this day onwards should be blamed on Obama because he has embraced this new strategy of letting Mubarak defy the popular will of the Egyptian people.  I don't trust the Egyptian army: the top brass is hand picked by the US/Israel and can be easily bought off by a combination of bribes, gadgets, and perks.  They could care less about the Egyptian people.  This is part of the ruling group of this tyrant.  The speech by Obama was a not-so-coded language that let Mubarak do what he wish: the talk about transition means that he was basically told to stay in power, because Israel really freaked out at the prospect of Egypt without Mubarak.  How dare Obama talk about technology for the Egyptian youth when his speech did not utter one word about how Mubarak is silencing and restricting the technology of the youth of people. Make no mistake about it: this could be like the 1953 Operation Ajax in Iran.  The US is now arranging for a coup against the will of the Egyptian people.  It requires utmost vigilance and steadfastness and thus far those qualities have been abundant among the Egyptian people.  This move by Obama towards Egypt can be described as criminal because it will lead to blood on the streets.  I wonder if Obama during his talk with Mubarak discussed numbers like: just don't kill more than 50 or 60 a day, or something like that. His unprincipled cynicism reminds me of the conspiracies of the 1950s.  I am so glad that I resisted all efforts by my liberal and leftist friends who were urging me to vote for this personification of the Bush Doctrine. (Angry Arab)